welcome购彩大厅客户端下载_welcome购彩大厅网投

来源：welcome购彩大厅下载app2024-06-15 17:48

人才是第一资源******

　　作者：薄贵利

　　人才是富国之本、兴邦大计。习近平总书记在党的二十大报告中强调，必须坚持“人才是第一资源”，深入实施“人才强国战略”，坚持“人才引领驱动”。当前，世界新一轮科技革命和产业变革正在重构全球创新版图、重塑全球经济结构。创新驱动实质上是人才驱动，谁拥有一流的创新人才，谁就拥有科技创新的优势和主导权。

　　中国共产党的百年奋斗史，也是一部集聚人才、团结人才、造就人才、壮大人才的历史。革命战争年代，着眼革命斗争需要，我们党大力培养选拔对党忠诚、英勇善战、不怕牺牲的干部。新中国成立后，着眼开展大规模经济建设，我们党大力培养选拔懂政治、懂业务、又红又专的干部。党的十一届三中全会后，着眼推进改革开放和社会主义现代化建设，我们党大力培养选拔有知识、懂专业、锐意改革的干部。正是坚持党爱人才、党兴人才、党聚人才，我们党培养造就一批又一批优秀人才，始终充满生机活力，团结带领人民取得了一个又一个伟大胜利。

　　党的十八大以来，以习近平同志为核心的党中央统筹中华民族伟大复兴战略全局和世界百年未有之大变局，全面深入推进人才强国战略，高瞻远瞩谋划人才事业布局，大刀阔斧改革创新，广开进贤之路、广聚天下英才，深刻回答了为什么建设人才强国、什么是人才强国、怎样建设人才强国的重大理论和实践问题，推动新时代人才工作取得历史性成就、发生历史性变革。

　　踏上全面建设社会主义现代化国家、向第二个百年奋斗目标进军的新征程，我们比历史上任何时期都更加接近实现中华民族伟大复兴的宏伟目标，也比历史上任何时期都更加渴求人才。赢得国际竞争的主动，实现我们党确定的奋斗目标，完成中华民族伟大复兴历史伟业，都要靠人才。

　　习近平总书记指出：“我国拥有世界上规模最大的高等教育体系，有各项事业发展的广阔舞台，完全能够源源不断培养造就大批优秀人才，完全能够培养出大师。我们要有这样的决心、这样的自信。”目前，我国已成为全球规模最宏大、门类最齐全的人才资源大国，在全球创新指数排名中，我国从2012年的第三十四位上升到2022年的第十一位。新时代十年，我国教育、科技、人才事业蓬勃发展，为书写经济快速发展和社会长期稳定两大奇迹新篇章奠定了坚实基础。

　　人才强国建设是一项需要持之以恒、久久为功的历史性工程，需要遵循人才成长规律，坚定走好人才自主培养之路，不断优化人才队伍结构，重点抓好战略科学家、顶尖人才、“卡脖子”技术攻关人才、基础研究人才的培养，培养造就大批哲学家、社会科学家、文学艺术家等各方面人才，为全面建成社会主义现代化强国凝聚强大动力、提供强大支撑。同时，持续深化人才发展体制机制改革，不断提高人才政策精准化程度，下力气深化人才发展体制机制改革，解决好人才评价唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项等问题，加快形成有利于人才成长的培养机制、有利于人尽其才的使用机制、有利于人才各展其能的激励机制、有利于人才脱颖而出的竞争机制，让各类人才的创造活力竞相迸发、聪明才智充分涌流，为实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦汇聚磅礴力量。（薄贵利）

welcome购彩大厅客户端下载

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.